Sign in with your E-Mail & Password
Trending Articles
Featured Blogs
Raleigh Becket's absence in Pacific Rim: Uprising was painfully evident

Raleigh Becket's absence in Pacific Rim: Uprising was painfully evident

1 RepliesAdd A Reply
Forum Topic


ConversationalistMember1067 XPApr-01-2018 1:48 PM

I'm not sure if I'm the only one, but to me, Pacific Rim: Uprising's lack of Charlie Hunnam, as Raleigh Becket, was one of the major contributing factors to it not being as good as the first.

I thought John Boyega and Scott Eastwood did fantastic in their roles, but I just couldn't get past the film without thinking of Raleigh's whereabouts at certain points.

To be fair, Charlie Hunnam did have scheduling conflicts, but the way that they also just reduced Mako to a minor role in the first 20 minutes of the film made it harder for the film to get over, in my opinion. An explanation for Becket's absence could have been given at some point had Mako stuck around longer, as they surely would have kept contact after the events of the first film.

The way the film, apart from Hermann and Newt's involvement, shunned many aspects of the original resulted in it feeling much different from the first film, and without Guillermo Del Toro's touch, it lost the spark that made the first so successful.

I still enjoyed the sequel, and hope tjay Raleigh can return in Pacific Rim 3, if there is one.


Remember that chap, I forget his name, he climbed Everest without any oxygen, came down nearly dead. They asked him, they said "Why did you go up there to die?" He said I didn't, "I went up there to live".
1 Responses to Raleigh Becket's absence in Pacific Rim: Uprising was painfully evident

G. H. (Gman)

2KAdmin4209 XPApr-01-2018 9:00 PM

Director Steven DeKnight said he purposefully left Beckett's whereabouts ambiguous for the hope Hunnam would return in a future installment. (Something that may not happen if the box office keeps falling like it is...)

As much as I liked Raleigh's character, I always felt Hunnam didn't do him service. And while I prefer Raleigh to Jake, Boyega is just a more charismatic actor.

Ultimately, I felt it wasn't Raleigh's absence that was painfully evident, but del Toro's. I like Pacific Rim: Uprising for what it is, but what made the original so good was del Toro's nuance and attention to detail--His unwavering dedication to treat campiness like an art form and give the most minor characters a connective sense of presence. This is what makes Pacific Rim the best of Legendary's giant monster flicks and one of the genre's best in well over a decade.

Ultimately, Uprising was not the sequel del Toro planned to give us and I forever wish we got that movie. But at minimum I'm happy the Pacific Rim franchise was given another go. It may not have worked, but it deserved the shot.

"None of this makes any sense, it doesn't really matter. We just needed an excuse for them to do something and they had to go somewhere." - Adam Wingard
Add A Reply

Sign in to add a reply to this topic!

New Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
98% To Next Rank
82% To Next Rank
86% To Next Rank
G. H. (Gman)
G. H. (Gman)
84% To Next Rank
76% To Next Rank
Support Us
Latest Activity
Gojira Forces (Lim Chen Xi) just cast their vote on the Poll: Favorite sequel
Three greatest movie adaptations of books just surpassed 1,000 views!

Find the best top 10 casino in Canada!

Scified is an entertainment media network covering the latest news on the most popular, upcoming science fiction movies, games and television. All content is property of unless otherwise stated. Images and names of content we promote, discuss, review or report are property of their respective owners. Scified is independantly owned and operated by a team of dedicated sci-fi movie fans, who strive to provide the best information and community experience for other like-minded sci-fi movie enthusiasts.

© 2021