Scified Homepage
News
The Rising Unpopularity of the Found Footage movie!

The Rising Unpopularity of the Found Footage movie!

Scified.com
By GavinScified DarkPublished: September 16, 2016

This week sees the release of Blair Witch, another sequel to the 1999 horror movie that spearheaded a wave of movies using a handheld photography technique that has become synonymous with the genre of "found footage" movies, in which the movies footage is presented as allegedly factual events captured in real time. Created by Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez the Blair Witch Project took inspiration from supernatural documentaries with improvised performances from the cast to create the movies unique "fly-on-the-wall" style. Marketed almost entirely by Myrick and Sanchez through their official website, the movie is also cited as one of the forebearers of "viral marketing". Receiving critical acclaim upon its release The Blair Witch Project earned $248 million in worldwide box office takings against a $60,000 production budget.

 

What has followed is a wave of "found footage" movies that have tried to emulate the success of Myrick and Sanchez's groundbreaking movie, many of which are, unsurprisingly, fellow horror movies. The Last Exorcism, R.E.C. and the Diary of the Dead are but a few of the plethora of micro-budget found footage movies that have flooded the horror genre. 2007's Paranormal Activity elaborated upon the technique adding security camera footage to add to the faux-realism of the movie. 2008's Cloverfield took found footage into the genre of science fiction, followed by movies such as Apollo 18, Europa Report, and Chronicle, further concreting the photography technique as the trending style of the new millennium.

Unfortunately, the technique has been so overused in the past 17 years by low budget filmmakers, especially within the genre of horror movies that it is now scorned upon by many, filmmakers and audiences alike. This is no surprise considering the low production costs, values, and practices that found footage compliments. A found footage movie does not require expensive cameras, lighting, set or location preparation. A fully realized script with extensive storyboards is also not as important as it is with mainstream cinema, with many found footage movies being improvised around key scene concepts rather than a pre-meditated narrative. So unpopular as the Found Footage movie become that Brad Fuller, Executive Producer on the "in development" Friday the 13th reboot refuses to utilize the technique despite the movies struggle to move beyond the planning platform.

The possibilities as a photography technique found footage has to offer movie audiences have barely been explored, especially by Hollywood's premier directors; none of which have yet utilized it in their multi-million dollar blockbusters, epics, reboots, and remakes. Past movies such as Steven Speilberg's Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List or even the more recent Legend by British director Guy Ritchie, which chronicled the notorious Kray twins (both portrayed by Tom Hardy) could have benefited from using found footage photography, either in key scenes or throughout. This would have added a sense of documentation on these "based on real life events" movies that is almost impossible using accepted filmmaking techniques.

 

For now, the found footage movie will likely continue to be frowned upon by both filmmakers and audiences until a talented director is willing to risk millions of a Hollywood studio's hard earned dollars and produce a critically and commercially successful big budget example of how to use the technique to its fullest. This week's Blair Witch may not be that movie, but it could likely inspire someone in Hollywood to take on the found footage movie.

User Avatar
Chris
Group: Admin
Rank: Atman
View Profile

Nice article Gavin. I agree, most of the found footage films are hard to watch - many experience severe headaches and nausea from watching them. The trick is not to be overdramatic with the camera handling. A middle ground between found footage and conventional filmmaking could be the sweet spot these directors are after, since like you said, it makes the film seem more "real".

Paranormal Activity was pretty good and sparked a ton of (not so great) sequels, but nonetheless gained traction and attention in Hollywood. Cloverfield on the other hand, despite me enjoying the concept, was way to shaky. It's difficult to watch that film without taking breaks periodically.

I'm sure that middle ground is out there, it just requires the right director with the right vision.

User Avatar
9876543210
Group: Member
Rank: Noob
View Profile

A Free File transfer tool that allows users to share Music, Movies, Games, Photos and .apk files between two Wi-fi compatible devices download share it apk

Join the discussion!



Recently Active Forums
Alien: Earth Series Discussion Forum
Alien: Earth SeriesDiscuss the Alien FX TV series here!
Godzilla x Kong: Supernova Discussion Forum
Godzilla x Kong: SupernovaDiscussions about the Monsterverse movie Godzilla x Kong: Supernova
Marvel Discussion Forum
MarvelDiscuss everything Marvel here
Jurassic World Rebirth Discussion Forum
Jurassic World RebirthDiscuss the new Jurassic World film by Gareth Edwards!
New Forum Topics
Hot Forum Topics
Latest Media
Scified Community Stats
Scified hosts a network of online communities containing 406,147 posts by 48,401 members (7 are online now). The Alien: Earth Series Forum is the most recently active forum. The latest Forum topic added was: Honest first impressions of Alien: Earth
VIPWhat are VIP?AdminModeratorSpecial TitleMemberLeaderboard
Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!



Forgot Password?

Log in to view your personalized notifications across Scified!

Scified Website LogoScified is the Hub for Sci-Fi Movie Fandoms
Hosted Fansites
AlienFansite
GodzillaFansite
PredatorFansite
Main Menu
Community
Sci-Fi Movies
Help & Info
+

Sign In to contribute!